Are you aware that the United States Supreme Court abolished federal abortion rights? If you know that, you may want to read this article to learn more about the current circumstances.
In the past 50 years, Roe v. Wade has lost its significance as the foundation of constitutional rights that extend beyond abortion. The rejection of this ruling by the Supreme Court on Friday makes it clear that other rights based on the same principle of privacy, such as those for same-gender marriage, interracial marriages, and the right to use contraception, are also at risk. Read Clarence Thomas on Contraception in more detail.
Legal challenge to contraception and same-gender marriage.
The US Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday, which abolished the long-standing constitutional protection for abortion, was hidden by a concurring opinion by conservative Justice Clarence Thomas. He requested the court to revisit decisions it had already made regarding same-gender marriage and contraception. Thomas added to the already high worry among women and LGBTQ organizations that the end of Roe would only be the beginning when he said, “In future issues, we should review all of this court’s substantive due process [principles].”
Supreme Court Contraception Ruling: Griswold v. Connecticut case
The Griswold v. Connecticut case in 1965 established a married couple’s freedom to use contraception without government interference. The court also ruled that states could not criminalize sodomy. The court established the right for same-sex couples to marry in the 2015 case Obergefell v. Hodged. Before Friday, all three landmark decisions, Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey established a legal right to abortion care. But, in their legal analysis, they largely depended on the notion of constitutional.
Supreme Court Contraception Case
President Biden has asked the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure access to contraceptive and abortion medicines. It’s not obvious, though, if this strategy would hold up in court. Particularly intrauterine devices (IUDs) and emergency contraceptive treatments like the morning-after pill, states may restrict contraception without a court order and prosecute the medical professionals who provide it. In addition, IUDs and emergency contraception are subject to legislation certain states want to pursue.
The following details pertain to legal issues around same-gender marriage and contraception. We’ll let you know if there are any updates on this matter.
Final thoughts on Clarence Thomas on Contraception
This study argues that Roe v. Wade no longer serves as the core of constitutional rights beyond abortion. The highest court’s decision on Friday to overturn this decision makes it obvious that other rights founded on the same principle of privacy, including those for same-gender marriage, interracial marriages, and the right to use contraception, are also in danger. For more information on birth control, click here
Do you have any thoughts about these circumstances? Then please let us know in the Clarence Thomas on Contraception comment section.
Also Read : – Why Is Isaiah Thomas Not In The NBA (Aug) Know Here!